← Retirement library

Retirement library · Income in retirement

A second look at a retirement plan
that seems to be working.

Nothing is wrong. The bills are paid and the rent comes in. That is when a second look costs least.

· Written 10 October 2026 · Checked 27 October 2026

A car stopped with its bonnet up at the start of a long road, while one person shows another what to check.
Even a plan that is working deserves a second look.
AI illustration of Nicholas Lockhart
Listen to Nicholas read this article
Read by an AI version of Nicholas’s voice, from the article he wrote.
3 min

A retirement plan that seems to be working is the one people least want to look at. You may have said it yourself: “We don’t want to rock the boat.” That is a fair instinct. When the rent arrives and the bills are paid, a review feels like looking for trouble. But a second look changes nothing on its own. It shows whether the plan is doing what you think it is.

What a second look finds

  • Income lower than it could be. A property that grew well but now pays a low yield on what it is worth.
  • Tax that could be lower. Ownership that suited the working years and no longer does.
  • A sale coming, unplanned. A cash shortfall five or eight years out that nobody has modelled.
  • Rules that moved. Negative gearing changes from the 2027-28 income year and capital gains from 1 July 2027, and SMSF borrowing to buy residential property ended on 10 August 2026.

The goalposts keep moving

The goalposts have moved for 30 years, and 2026 moved several at once. A plan set in 2019 was built for rules that are changing. That does not make it wrong. It means it was never checked against the rules it now lives under.

Example: the plan that was working

Graham and Lyn, both 70, hold two investment properties, one bought in 1998 and one in 2012. They are debt free, the rent covers their life, and they see no reason to change anything.

Modelled side by side, one property pays them 2.4 per cent on what it is now worth. Selling it, paying the tax and holding the proceeds differently could lift their income by about a third, and it would also hand that property’s future growth to the next owner. Both sides sit in the model. Holding is still a fine choice. Now it is a choice they made with the numbers in front of them.

When to look

When nothing is wrong. A review in a calm year has time and choices. A review after a vacancy, a health scare or a rule change has fewer of both.

Who this does not suit

Someone whose whole retirement is the Age Pension and a home has fewer moving parts to review. For anyone holding investment property or a self-managed fund, a second look every few years is ordinary care.

A second look sets what you hold now beside the alternatives, under today’s rules, and the decision stays yours. To have one, book a first conversation. It costs nothing, and if your plan is sound, you will be told so.

Nicholas Lockhart

More about the service →

Your view helps the next person find clarity and confidence. Leave a Google review.

Leave a review

Get a feel for us first.A mentor with experience since 1997, from the first conversation to the keys and beyond.

Connect with Nicholas →

Clarity first. Confidence follows. The MRD way.